Why Don't Child Molesters Show Remorse?

As people who love children and are involved in children's ministry, we find it inconceivable that anyone could intentionally desire a sexual relationship with a child. We are repulsed by the very idea of child sexual abuse. And, as a result of this response, many people are offended by the apparent lack of remorse demonstrated by child sexual abusers-a troubling characteristic displayed by Ronnie and Karl, two child molesters featured in the Protecting God's Children™ awareness videos.

It is easy to see why we are confused and angered by people who hurt our children and show no regret for their actions. We can't understand how anyone could talk about having sex with a child without expressing remorse, regret, or, at the very least, some genuine guilt. But, is the lack of remorse by abusers really a factor in preventing child sexual abuse?

In his book, Unspeakable Acts: Why Men Sexually Abuse Children, Douglas Pryor extensively researched a group of men incarcerated for sexually abusing children.[i] One focus of the research was what Pryor calls "exiting offending."[ii] Pryor wanted to know how a child molester stops having sex with children, in favor of more conventional, acceptable behavior.

Pryor says the offender goes through three basic stages en route to ceasing the abusive behavior. Those stages are:

      1. Boundary reemergence.
      2. Detection.
      3. Reaction and devastation.

In the boundary reemergence stage, the offender may become overwhelmed with fear and anxiety about being caught. He may try to stop offending at some point-primarily because of the fear of being caught.[iv] During this stage of the process, some of the studied offenders began to deal with the moral wrong of their actions but were unable to sustain their abstinence for any extended period of time.[v]

During the detection phase, offenders are confronted by the disclosure of their behavior. Though most may initially deny the allegations, many offenders eventually admit to their behavior-just like Ronnie and Karl did on the video. They have excuses-both for why they acted the way they did and for why they got caught.[vi]

In the reaction and devastation stage, an offender's initial response to detection is either relief or panic.[vii] In the study group, some were relieved that their abusive behavior was revealed. Others were in a state of panic-worried about how the disclosure would affect their name, reputation, family, etc. In some cases, both reactions were present.[viii]

Later, when the gravity of their actions was realized, those in the study group were emotionally despondent about the situation, and many became determined to make changes in their behavior.[ix] These represent the offenders who commit to lifestyle structures that inhibit their ability to act on their deviant sexual desires. For these offenders, their remorse is demonstrated by their commitment to take all steps necessary to inhibit their own inappropriate behaviors.

When viewing the offenders in the Protecting God's Children videos, it is important to remember that these two men have been in therapy for many, many years. Their recovery process most certainly included all of the stages or phases identified by Pryor's research. In addition, these two offenders' participation in the Protecting God's Children videos reinforces the strong structures created to help assure that neither man ever again acts on his desire to have sex with minors.

These positive steps are great. But, many of us expect something more from offenders. We expect that someone who has so clearly wronged a child should know that his or her behavior is wrong and that he or she should express sorrow for those actions-regularly, frequently and, perhaps, forever. Even Karl, who was arrested more 15 years ago, is expected to be continuously repentant-even though all these years have passed.

The real problem and obstacle is not a lack of remorse by offenders. Rather, the real problem is a lack of proactive intervention and a misguided trust that allows almost anyone to have unsupervised access to our children. It is our job to sharpen our senses to the signs of risky behavior and to actively intervene to prevent abuse from occurring. Once children are safe, we can delve further into the question of why offenders do what they do and how they feel about their actions.

First, stop the behavior-then go to work to correct the core causes.

© 2001-2004 St. James Cadyville. All rights reserved. (http://www.stjamescadyville.com)